<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ASSAF Blog &#187; countries</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.assaf-interactive.org.za/tag/countries/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.assaf-interactive.org.za</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 12:51:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Biosafety and paranoia post-9/11</title>
		<link>http://www.assaf-interactive.org.za/2009/08/18/biosafety-and-paranoia-post-911/</link>
		<comments>http://www.assaf-interactive.org.za/2009/08/18/biosafety-and-paranoia-post-911/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 19:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phakamile</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biorisks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biosafety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[countries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.assaf-interactive.org.za/?p=263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since the bombings of the Twin Towers in the US on September 11, 2001 there has been a great deal of emphasis on safety in different countries. Some countries have stepped-up and strenghtened their safety so as to ensure this doesn&#8217;t happen to them. The other issue of biosafety against any form of biorisks has also seen many countries form specialised committees [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the bombings of the <a href="http://www.google.com">Twin Towers </a>in the US on <a href="http://www.google.com">September 11, 2001 </a>there has been a great deal of emphasis on safety in different countries. Some countries have stepped-up and strenghtened their safety so as to ensure this doesn&#8217;t happen to them. The other issue of <a href="http://www.google.com">biosafety</a> against any form of <a href="http://www.google.com">biorisks</a> has also seen many countries form specialised committees of scientific <a href="http://www.google.com">experts</a> and/or agencies that specialise in dealing with biorisks. Biosafety policies have been implemented by some countries whereas others are still in the process of either developing or implementing them.</p>
<p>Even though these biosafety policies are good and necessary, there also seems to be a degree of <a href="http://www.google.com">paranoia</a> in some countries. Some academic institutions/<a href="http://www.google.com">biotechnology </a>research centers have suffered because of the restrictions imposed by these policies, where, amongst other things, they can&#8217;t work with certain <a href="http://www.google.com">pathogens</a> as they are demeed biological risks. Paranoia about biosafety is even evident at airports in certain countries. Despite all this paranoia, many lessons have been learnt regarding <a href="http://www.google.com">good laboratory practice (GLP)</a> and <a href="http://www.google.com">ethical </a>issues surrounding biosafety. As the saying goes: it&#8217;s better to be safe than sorry!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.assaf-interactive.org.za/2009/08/18/biosafety-and-paranoia-post-911/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

